Falsification Analysis
Δ(d) dimensionality sweep, threshold pressure, and live falsification telemetry
Current Status
Loading…
Loading...
Research Framing
This panel reports falsification-oriented telemetry for the Continuation Observatory measurement layer. Dry-run or synthetic sweep outputs are interface/demo data; live empirical findings come from real runs.
The live view uses telemetry panels, so the evidence figure anchors the same separation pattern the observatory stress-tests here.
Figure 2 · Entanglement-gap evidence
Δ = 0.381), and the temporal panel shows the separation persisting relative to the threshold. It sits in the falsification workflow because this is the page where the observatory evaluates whether the signal survives or collapses.Recent Falsification Alerts
Loading…
Threshold Definitions
- COLLECTING — Awaiting Real Data
- All available dimensionality sweep runs used
dry_run: true. Dry-run data support interface inspection only. - GREEN — Signal Holds
- All Δ(d) values at d ∈ {100, 200, 500} remain ≥ 0.10 for all real-run models. The entropy gap stays robust across high dimensionalities. Current data keep the UCIP hypothesis in force for these models.
- YELLOW — Marginal Regime
- At least one d>100 value falls below 0.10 while high-dimensional collapse remains above 0.05. This is a monitoring alert and calls for continued data collection.
- RED — Collapse Threshold Breached
- All Δ(d) at d ∈ {100, 200, 500} fall below 0.05. The entropy gap collapses to sampling-noise levels at high dimensionality. This constitutes evidence against the UCIP hypothesis for the affected model(s).